16 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Brian Altenhofel commented  ·  May 15, 2013 12:44 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  It's been 14 months - is there any update on the progress for this? This is absolutely essential to many business models.

• Phil commented  ·  February 26, 2013 4:42 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This is a must!

• J commented  ·  December 28, 2012 12:38 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  +3 here as well - as someone else said, involving this also in the API would be amazing

• Justin Jenkins commented  ·  July 13, 2012 2:07 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This would be amazingly helpful and useful for our business. Not only internally but it would also allow us to setup a pricing model that would accurately reflect usage of individual clients instead of having to set a more basic overall pricing where some people are paying for the usage of others. We'd much rather charge our clients who use more for their usage, than trying to spread the cost across our user base.

• Anonymous commented  ·  June 13, 2012 12:46 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I would suggest that this be implemented by means of the API and not just a counter displayed in the Control Panel

• Jeremy commented  ·  April 12, 2012 12:06 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  +3 on this from us - we also need to support multiple clients.

• Robert Clarke commented  ·  March 18, 2012 11:02 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I think this would even be even awesomer on a per-file basis, in case there's one specific file hogging the bandwidth

• Anonymous commented  ·  February 28, 2012 5:14 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  If this could be broken down on invoices also, that would be very helpful

• Ruald Ordelman commented  ·  February 10, 2012 5:26 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Please start with it. We need this for our SaaS product to see the data storage and traffic per bucket / container.

• James commented  ·  July 21, 2011 9:56 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This would be HUGE for our company. I just wrote an app using the cloud file API that grabs all CDN logs and opens them up and organizes them. Only I discovered that the log files are not a good source to track actual cloud file usage. Kinda disappointing...

• Cam Findlay commented  ·  June 28, 2011 6:54 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Bandwidth use on a per file basis would be great too

• Martin Miksch commented  ·  June 24, 2011 8:25 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Really need this to support multiple clients

• Kevin commented  ·  June 15, 2011 12:58 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Really need this to use with a number of clients. Thank You!

• nikolas zantalis commented  ·  May 4, 2011 8:37 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  We need this too! Please look into this.

• David Simpson commented  ·  February 21, 2011 10:52 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This would be a really great feature for our company.

• Paul Morel commented  ·  December 13, 2010 8:49 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This option would be very useful for tracking not only client specific containers but also various content delivery usage information. Pooling all bandwidth and file storage information at the account level is not detailed enough to understand usage patterns.